direkt zum Inhalt springen

direkt zum Hauptnavigationsmenü

Sie sind hier

TU Berlin

Page Content

Evaluation of the lecture: Network Protocols and Architectures (WS 2011/12)

The answers to the following questions are usually:

  • I totally agree
  • I quite agree
  • I agree a bit
  • I disagree


  • nearly always
  • often
  • sometimes
  • seldom

Questions about the tutorial

Lupe [1]
  • Are the tutorials encouraging students to actively participage?
  • Are the students encouraged to contribute their own ideas and interests in the tutorials?
  • Are the students encouraged to think about the problem in the tutorials?
  • Do students learn interesting and new topics or techniques while solving the exercises?
  • Are the students encouraged to present their own solutions for tasks/problems?

Attendance (Tutorial)

Lupe [2]

How often did you attend the tutorial during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times

Questions about the whole course

Relevance for research

Lupe [3]
  • In the course research is pointed out.
  • The contents of the course are up-to-date to the state of research in the field of the course.
  • The course refers to examples in current research.
  • The course motivates me to work in the regarding field (e.g., diplom thesis)

Relevance for working life

Lupe [4]
  • I can see that the contents of the course are relevant for my working life.
  • In the course one gets to know examples from working life.
  • I can use the course's contents in my later career.
  • The course motivates me to take a job in the regarding field.

Relevance for the main focus of the studies

Lupe [5]
  • I get a good overview about the contents of the main focus of my studies.
  • The course encourages me to take other courses in this field.
  • The course motivates to choose the field as main focus.
  • The course prepares well for the main focus.

Questions about the lecture

Attendance (Lecture)

Lupe [6]

How often did you attend the lecture during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times


Lupe [7]
  • I can follow the contents of the lecture without difficulty and I understand it well.
  • Is the structure of the tlak in the lecture clearly articulated?
  • Are the abbreviations and symbols used in the lecture clearly understandably explained?
  • The amount of matter can easily be manged.

Talk style

Lupe [8]
  • Does the lecturer keep eye contact to the students?
  • Does the lecturer's talk style motivate the students?
  • Are the contents of the lecture illustrated by concrete examples?
  • Do you think the lecturer tries to give a good talk?

Use of Media

Lupe [9]
  • The lecture is supported meaningfully by media (blackboard, slides, beamer, models, …).
  • The targeted use of media helps me to follow the lecture.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are clearly readable.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are comprehensible.
  • The "appropriate" media is used at the "appropriate" time in the lecture.


Lupe [10]
  • I cannot keep up to the lecture due to content overload.
  • The lecture is exhausting.
  • The lecture is boring.

General statements about the motivation

Lupe [11]
  • I am learning a lot useful things.
  • The contents of the course are very interesting for me.
  • The course motivates me to deal with the matter further on.
  • how did your motivation change throughout the semester? (possible answers: increased a lot – increased – decreased – decreased a lot)

Further questions about the course

Lupe [12]

What do you think about the course in total?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad
Lupe [13]

If you think about your studies of electrical engineering or computer science, resp.: How difficult is the subject of this course compared to your previous courses?

  • very difficult
  • rather difficult
  • middle
  • rather easy
  • very easy
Lupe [14]

How much time per week did you need to prepare and rework the lecture without the time in the lecture (and the excercises)?

Lupe [15]

What do you think: How will you be fraded at the end of the lecture?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad


  • Top Grundlagenveranstaltung
  • Tutorium nicht nur fuer die Korrektur und dem Durchgehen der HA nutzen.
    Eventuell noch andere Sachen aus der VL besprechen oder Aufgaben.
  • Mehr "Real World"-Analogien! Diese sind sehr hilfreich und gut gewesen!
    Zum Ende der Lehrveranstaltung waren die Inhalte der Vorlesung etwas
    redundant gewesen. Ansonsten gute Struktur im Laufe des Semesters!
  • *Thumbs Up*
  • Teilweise ueberladene Folien (eher selten)
  • Please replace the comic-sans-font in the sildes
    I really enjoyed the freedom of the languages
  • Uebungsbetrieb hilft sehr immer am Ball zu bleiben :)
  • Please repair the beamer! and the lights in the room (they flicker)

    Lehre / Teaching, WS 2012/13

    • Network Protocols and Architectures (VL+UE) [16]
    • NA: Internet Routing (SE) [17]
    • Meshlab (PR) [18]

    NPA: Navigation

    • Network Protocols and Architectures (VL+UE) [19]
    • NPA WS 12/13 – Tutorials [20]
    • NPA WS 12/13 – Literature [21]
    • NPA WS 12/13 – Lecture evaluation [22]

    Network Protocols and Architectures
    0432 L 810
    Integrierte LV (VL mit UE)

    Lecturer: Anja Feldmann, Stefan Schmid, Petr Kuznetsov, Marco Canini

    17.10.2012 to 15.02.2013

    We 10:00 - 12:00 o'clock
    Th 14:00 - 16:00 o'clock

    Location: MA 042/043

    from 17.10.2012 12:00 o'clock

    Website [23]
    ISIS [24]
    ------ Links: ------

    Zusatzinformationen / Extras

    Quick Access:

    Schnellnavigation zur Seite über Nummerneingabe

    Copyright TU Berlin 2008