direkt zum Inhalt springen

direkt zum Hauptnavigationsmenü

Sie sind hier

TU Berlin

Page Content

Evaluation of the lecture: Network Protocols and Architectures (WS 2011/12)

General Questions (Subject)

Lupe

Major subject:

  • Electrical Engineering (Elektrotechnik)
  • Computer Science (Informatik)
  • Computer Engineering (Technische Informatik)
  • Other (anderes)
  • No answer (keine Antwort)

The answers to the following questions are usually:

  • I totally agree
  • I quite agree
  • I agree a bit
  • I disagree

or

  • nearly always
  • often
  • sometimes
  • seldom

Questions about the tutorial

Lupe
  • Are the tutorials encouraging students to actively participage?
  • Are the students encouraged to contribute their own ideas and interests in the tutorials?
  • Are the students encouraged to think about the problem in the tutorials?
  • Do students learn interesting and new topics or techniques while solving the exercises?
  • Are the students encouraged to present their own solutions for tasks/problems?

Attendance (Tutorial)

Lupe

How often did you attend the tutorial during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times

Questions about the whole course

Relevance for research

Lupe
  • In the course research is pointed out.
  • The contents of the course are up-to-date to the state of research in the field of the course.
  • The course refers to examples in current research.
  • The course motivates me to work in the regarding field (e.g., diplom thesis)

Relevance for working life

Lupe
  • I can see that the contents of the course are relevant for my working life.
  • In the course one gets to know examples from working life.
  • I can use the course's contents in my later career.
  • The course motivates me to take a job in the regarding field.

Relevance for the main focus of the studies

Lupe
  • I get a good overview about the contents of the main focus of my studies.
  • The course encourages me to take other courses in this field.
  • The course motivates to choose the field as main focus.
  • The course prepares well for the main focus.

Questions about the lecture

Attendance (Lecture)

Lupe

How often did you attend the lecture during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times

Comprehensibility

Lupe
  • I can follow the contents of the lecture without difficulty and I understand it well.
  • Is the structure of the tlak in the lecture clearly articulated?
  • Are the abbreviations and symbols used in the lecture clearly understandably explained?
  • The amount of matter can easily be manged.

Talk style

Lupe
  • Does the lecturer keep eye contact to the students?
  • Does the lecturer's talk style motivate the students?
  • Are the contents of the lecture illustrated by concrete examples?
  • Do you think the lecturer tries to give a good talk?

Use of Media

Lupe
  • The lecture is supported meaningfully by media (blackboard, slides, beamer, models, …).
  • The targeted use of media helps me to follow the lecture.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are clearly readable.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are comprehensible.
  • The "appropriate" media is used at the "appropriate" time in the lecture.

Miscellaneous

Lupe
  • I cannot keep up to the lecture due to content overload.
  • The lecture is exhausting.
  • The lecture is boring.

General statements about the motivation

Lupe
  • I am learning a lot useful things.
  • The contents of the course are very interesting for me.
  • The course motivates me to deal with the matter further on.
  • how did your motivation change throughout the semester? (possible answers: increased a lot – increased – decreased – decreased a lot)

Further questions about the course

Lupe

What do you think about the course in total?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad
Lupe

If you think about your studies of electrical engineering or computer science, resp.: How difficult is the subject of this course compared to your previous courses?

  • very difficult
  • rather difficult
  • middle
  • rather easy
  • very easy
Lupe

How much time per week did you need to prepare and rework the lecture without the time in the lecture (and the excercises)?

Lupe

What do you think: How will you be fraded at the end of the lecture?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad

Comments

  • If the solutions of exercises are to available in the tutorial classes.
  • The lecture style of Prof. Feldmann, which is more questions ↔ answer based, is really good. It seldom gets boring this way and you actually think about the presented things.
    I wish the other lecturers would do the same.
  • I am thirsty of learning more and more of this kind of topics.
    Thanks from all lecturers and tutors.
    regards, Best.
  • Sometimes the lecturer speaks fast.
  • Thanks a lot for hard working of all lecturers of this course esp. Dr. Feldmann but tutors does not give us more hours as consultation hours.
  • I like this course.
    Danke
  • Today all things were good and satisfying for me.
  • Fragen sind schwierig zu beantworten.
  • Folien könnten teilweise besser gestaltet werden, die Hausaufgaben waren teilweise seltsam – es schien sich niemand so völlig zuständig zu fühlen. Die Programmieraufgabe war schlecht spezifiziert.
  • [Zur Frage: Meinen Sie, die Dozentin bemüht sich darum, eine gute Vorlesung zu halten?] und sie schafft es auch.

Zusatzinformationen / Extras

Quick Access:

Schnellnavigation zur Seite über Nummerneingabe

Auxiliary Functions

Network Protocols and Architectures
0432 L 810
Integrierte LV (VL mit UE)

Lecturer: Anja Feldmann, Bernhard Ager, Petr Kuznetsov, Stefan Schmid

Period:
19.10.2011 to 16.02.2012

We 10:00 - 12:00 o'clock
Th 14:00 - 16:00 o'clock

Location: mi/we: MA 042; do/th: MA 043

Website
Course overview (LSF)
ISIS

Hint:
mi/we: Vorlesung auf deutsch; do/th: lecture in english; Tutorials: tba