direkt zum Inhalt springen

direkt zum Hauptnavigationsmenü

Sie sind hier

TU Berlin

Page Content

Evaluation of the lecture: Network Protocols and Architectures (WS 2011/12)

General Questions (Subject)


Major subject:

  • Electrical Engineering (Elektrotechnik)
  • Computer Science (Informatik)
  • Computer Engineering (Technische Informatik)
  • Other (anderes)
  • No answer (keine Antwort)

The answers to the following questions are usually:

  • I totally agree
  • I quite agree
  • I agree a bit
  • I disagree


  • nearly always
  • often
  • sometimes
  • seldom

Questions about the tutorial

  • Are the tutorials encouraging students to actively participage?
  • Are the students encouraged to contribute their own ideas and interests in the tutorials?
  • Are the students encouraged to think about the problem in the tutorials?
  • Do students learn interesting and new topics or techniques while solving the exercises?
  • Are the students encouraged to present their own solutions for tasks/problems?

Attendance (Tutorial)


How often did you attend the tutorial during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times

Questions about the whole course

Relevance for research

  • In the course research is pointed out.
  • The contents of the course are up-to-date to the state of research in the field of the course.
  • The course refers to examples in current research.
  • The course motivates me to work in the regarding field (e.g., diplom thesis)

Relevance for working life

  • I can see that the contents of the course are relevant for my working life.
  • In the course one gets to know examples from working life.
  • I can use the course's contents in my later career.
  • The course motivates me to take a job in the regarding field.

Relevance for the main focus of the studies

  • I get a good overview about the contents of the main focus of my studies.
  • The course encourages me to take other courses in this field.
  • The course motivates to choose the field as main focus.
  • The course prepares well for the main focus.

Questions about the lecture

Attendance (Lecture)


How often did you attend the lecture during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times


  • I can follow the contents of the lecture without difficulty and I understand it well.
  • Is the structure of the tlak in the lecture clearly articulated?
  • Are the abbreviations and symbols used in the lecture clearly understandably explained?
  • The amount of matter can easily be manged.

Talk style

  • Does the lecturer keep eye contact to the students?
  • Does the lecturer's talk style motivate the students?
  • Are the contents of the lecture illustrated by concrete examples?
  • Do you think the lecturer tries to give a good talk?

Use of Media

  • The lecture is supported meaningfully by media (blackboard, slides, beamer, models, …).
  • The targeted use of media helps me to follow the lecture.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are clearly readable.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are comprehensible.
  • The "appropriate" media is used at the "appropriate" time in the lecture.


  • I cannot keep up to the lecture due to content overload.
  • The lecture is exhausting.
  • The lecture is boring.

General statements about the motivation

  • I am learning a lot useful things.
  • The contents of the course are very interesting for me.
  • The course motivates me to deal with the matter further on.
  • how did your motivation change throughout the semester? (possible answers: increased a lot – increased – decreased – decreased a lot)

Further questions about the course


What do you think about the course in total?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad

If you think about your studies of electrical engineering or computer science, resp.: How difficult is the subject of this course compared to your previous courses?

  • very difficult
  • rather difficult
  • middle
  • rather easy
  • very easy

How much time per week did you need to prepare and rework the lecture without the time in the lecture (and the excercises)?


What do you think: How will you be fraded at the end of the lecture?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad


  • If the solutions of exercises are to available in the tutorial classes.
  • The lecture style of Prof. Feldmann, which is more questions ↔ answer based, is really good. It seldom gets boring this way and you actually think about the presented things.
    I wish the other lecturers would do the same.
  • I am thirsty of learning more and more of this kind of topics.
    Thanks from all lecturers and tutors.
    regards, Best.
  • Sometimes the lecturer speaks fast.
  • Thanks a lot for hard working of all lecturers of this course esp. Dr. Feldmann but tutors does not give us more hours as consultation hours.
  • I like this course.
  • Today all things were good and satisfying for me.
  • Fragen sind schwierig zu beantworten.
  • Folien könnten teilweise besser gestaltet werden, die Hausaufgaben waren teilweise seltsam – es schien sich niemand so völlig zuständig zu fühlen. Die Programmieraufgabe war schlecht spezifiziert.
  • [Zur Frage: Meinen Sie, die Dozentin bemüht sich darum, eine gute Vorlesung zu halten?] und sie schafft es auch.

Zusatzinformationen / Extras

Quick Access:

Schnellnavigation zur Seite über Nummerneingabe

Network Protocols and Architectures
0432 L 810
Integrierte LV (VL mit UE)

Lecturer: Anja Feldmann, Bernhard Ager, Petr Kuznetsov, Stefan Schmid

19.10.2011 to 16.02.2012

We 10:00 - 12:00 o'clock
Th 14:00 - 16:00 o'clock

Location: mi/we: MA 042; do/th: MA 043

Course overview (LSF)

mi/we: Vorlesung auf deutsch; do/th: lecture in english; Tutorials: tba