TU Berlin

Internet Network ArchitecturesNPA WS 10/11 – Lecture evaluation

Page Content

to Navigation

Evaluation of the lecture: Network Protocols and Architectures (WS 2010/11)

General Questions (Subject)

Results: Subject / Studienrichtung
Lupe

Major subject:

  • Electrical Engineering (Elektrotechnik)
  • Computer Science (Informatik)
  • Computer Engineering (Technische Informatik)
  • Other (anderes)
  • No answer (keine Antwort)

The answers to the following questions are usually:

  • I totally agree
  • I quite agree
  • I agree a bit
  • I disagree

or

  • nearly always
  • often
  • sometimes
  • seldom

Questions about the tutorial

Results: Tutorials / Übungen
Lupe
  • Are the tutorials encouraging students to actively participage?
  • Are the students encouraged to contribute their own ideas and interests in the tutorials?
  • Are the students encouraged to think about the problem in the tutorials?
  • Do students learn interesting and new topics or techniques while solving the exercises?
  • Are the students encouraged to present their own solutions for tasks/problems?

Attendance (Tutorial)

Results: Attendance (Tutorial) / Anwesenheit (Übungen)
Lupe

How often did you attend the tutorial during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times

Questions about the whole course

Relevance for research

Results: Relevance for research / Forschungsbezug
Lupe
  • In the course research is pointed out.
  • The contents of the course are up-to-date to the state of research in the field of the course.
  • The course refers to examples in current research.
  • The course motivates me to work in the regarding field (e.g., diplom thesis)

Relevance for working life

Results: Practical relevance / Praxis-/Berufsbezug
Lupe
  • I can see that the contents of the course are relevant for my working life.
  • In the course one gets to know examples from working life.
  • I can use the course's contents in my later career.
  • The course motivates me to take a job in the regarding field.

Relevance for the main focus of the studies

Results: Relevance for study focus / Schwerpunktbezug
Lupe
  • I get a good overview about the contents of the main focus of my studies.
  • The course encourages me to take other courses in this field.
  • The course motivates to choose the field as main focus.
  • The course prepares well for the main focus.

Questions about the lecture

Attendance (Lecture)

Results: Attendance (lecture) / Anwesenheit (Vorlesung)
Lupe

How often did you attend the lecture during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times

Comprehensibility

Results: Comprehensability / Verständlichkeit
Lupe
  • I can follow the contents of the lecture without difficulty and I understand it well.
  • Is the structure of the tlak in the lecture clearly articulated?
  • Are the abbreviations and symbols used in the lecture clearly understandably explained?
  • The amount of matter can easily be manged.

Talk style

Results: Talk style / Vorlesungsstil
Lupe
  • Does the lecturer keep eye contact to the students?
  • Does the lecturer's talk style motivate the students?
  • Are the contents of the lecture illustrated by concrete examples?
  • Do you think the lecturer tries to give a good talk?

Use of Media

Results: Media use / Medieneinsatz
Lupe
  • The lecture is supported meaningfully by media (blackboard, slides, beamer, models, …).
  • The targeted use of media helps me to follow the lecture.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are clearly readable.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are comprehensible.
  • The "appropriate" media is used at the "appropriate" time in the lecture.

Miscellaneous

Results: Misc / Verschiedenes
Lupe
  • I cannot keep up to the lecture due to content overload.
  • The lecture is exhausting.
  • The lecture is boring.

General statements about the motivation

Results: General statements / allgemeine Aussagen
Lupe
  • I am learning a lot useful things.
  • The contents of the course are very interesting for me.
  • The course motivates me to deal with the matter further on.
  • how did your motivation change throughout the semester? (possible answers: increased a lot – increased – decreased – decreased a lot)

Further questions about the course

Results: General opinion / Allgemeine Beurteilung
Lupe

What do you think about the course in total?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad
Results: Difficulty / Schwierigkeit
Lupe

If you think about your studies of electrical engineering or computer science, resp.: How difficult is the subject of this course compared to your previous courses?

  • very difficult
  • rather difficult
  • middle
  • rather easy
  • very easy
Results: Preparation and rework / Vor- & Nachbereitung
Lupe

How much time per week did you need to prepare and rework the lecture without the time in the lecture (and the excercises)?

Results: Grading / Benotung
Lupe

What do you think: How will you be fraded at the end of the lecture?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad

Comments

  • Since not too many students in our class. If we change to a smaller classroom. I think that would be better.
  • Thanks for the lectures!
    • Sometimes the PPT of the course has nothing to do with the homework. And we feel they come from two totally different courses.
    • The English of the teacher is really not very good.

    • Viele Fragen dieser Evaluation sind jetzt nicht beantwortbar, weil sie zukünftiges Wissen voraussetzen (Forschung, Verhältnis zu zukünftigen VL)
    • Bisherige Kritik an der LV wurde mit teils widersprüchlichen Begründungen ignoriert.
    • Die Foliensätze sind unstrukturiert, z.B. NAT kommt mehrfach nur teilweise vor.
    • Erklärungen in den Folien sind mangelhaft f.d. Bewältigung d. Übungsbetriebes.

  • Beispiele an der Tafel von Fr. Feldmann auch von Dr. Schmid aufgreifen.
  • Gute Vorlesung, weiter so.

Navigation

Quick Access

Schnellnavigation zur Seite über Nummerneingabe