Evaluation of the lecture: Internet Security (SS 2012)

Results of the evaluation of the lecture Internet Security.

The answers to the following questions are usually:

• I totally agree
• I quite agree
• I agree a bit
• I disagree

or

• nearly always
• often
• sometimes
• seldom

Major subject:

• Electrical Engineering (Elektrotechnik)
• Computer Science (Informatik)
• Computer Engineering (Technische Informatik)
• Other (anderes)
• No answer (keine Antwort)

• In the course research is pointed out.
• The contents of the course are up-to-date to the state of research in the field of the course.
• The course refers to examples in current research.
• The course motivates me to work in the regarding field (e.g., diplom thesis)

• I can see that the contents of the course are relevant for my working life.
• In the course one gets to know examples from working life.
• I can use the course's contents in my later career.
• The course motivates me to take a job in the regarding field.

• I get a good overview about the contents of the main focus of my studies.
• The course encourages me to take other courses in this field.
• The course motivates to choose the field as main focus.
• The course prepares well for the main focus.

How often did you attend the lecture during the semester?

• (nearly) always
• 4–5 times
• 2–3 times
• 0–1 times

• I can follow the contents of the lecture without difficulty and I understand it well.
• Is the structure of the tlak in the lecture clearly articulated?
• Are the abbreviations and symbols used in the lecture clearly understandably explained?
• The amount of matter can easily be manged.

• Does the lecturer keep eye contact to the students?
• Does the lecturer's talk style motivate the students?
• Are the contents of the lecture illustrated by concrete examples?
• Do you think the lecturer tries to give a good talk?

• The lecture is supported meaningfully by media (blackboard, slides, beamer, models, …).
• The targeted use of media helps me to follow the lecture.
• The blackboard / slides in the lecture are clearly readable.
• The blackboard / slides in the lecture are comprehensible.
• The "appropriate" media is used at the "appropriate" time in the lecture.

• I cannot keep up to the lecture due to content overload.
• The lecture is exhausting.
• The lecture is boring.

• I am learning a lot useful things.
• The contents of the course are very interesting for me.
• The course motivates me to deal with the matter further on.
• how did your motivation change throughout the semester? (possible answers: increased a lot – increased – decreased – decreased a lot)

What do you think about the course in total?

• very good
• rather good
• middle
• rather bad
• very bad

If you think about your studies of electrical engineering or computer science, resp.: How difficult is the subject of this course compared to your previous courses?

• very difficult
• rather difficult
• middle
• rather easy
• very easy

How much time per week did you need to prepare and rework the lecture without the time in the lecture (and the excercises)?

What do you think: How will you be fraded at the end of the lecture?

• very good
• rather good
• middle
• rather bad
• very bad

• The topic was quite updated and give me a lot of understanding about the security and malicuous activites in Internet and give me a log of knowledge how to protect a network from such activities and will be more useful in my career in the future.
• I have a lot experience in the field, thus the lecture was boring some time, but not because of being a bad lecture.
• seems easy because things were usually well explained and interesting, although there was a lot of content.
• Begrenzender Faktor: English in verschiedenen Ausprachen.
• Es fehlt das Feld zum ankreuzen ob man es nicht einschätzen kann.
• Ich bitte Professor Seifert um mehr Vorbereitung für die Vorlesungen.
  Danke!
• Maybe Prof. Seifert could try to breathe deeply when trying to find his words to finish a long sentence. :-)