direkt zum Inhalt springen

direkt zum Hauptnavigationsmenü

Sie sind hier

TU Berlin

Page Content

Evaluation of the lecture: Internet Security (SS 2012)

Results of the evaluation of the lecture Internet Security [1].

The answers to the following questions are usually:

  • I totally agree
  • I quite agree
  • I agree a bit
  • I disagree


  • nearly always
  • often
  • sometimes
  • seldom

General Questions (Subject)

(Major) Subject / Studienrichtung
Lupe [2]

Major subject:

  • Electrical Engineering (Elektrotechnik)
  • Computer Science (Informatik)
  • Computer Engineering (Technische Informatik)
  • Other (anderes)
  • No answer (keine Antwort)

Questions about the whole course

Relevance for research

Relevance for Research
Lupe [3]
  • In the course research is pointed out.
  • The contents of the course are up-to-date to the state of research in the field of the course.
  • The course refers to examples in current research.
  • The course motivates me to work in the regarding field (e.g., diplom thesis)

Relevance for working life

Practical relevance
Lupe [4]
  • I can see that the contents of the course are relevant for my working life.
  • In the course one gets to know examples from working life.
  • I can use the course's contents in my later career.
  • The course motivates me to take a job in the regarding field.

Relevance for the main focus of the studies

Relevance for study focus
Lupe [5]
  • I get a good overview about the contents of the main focus of my studies.
  • The course encourages me to take other courses in this field.
  • The course motivates to choose the field as main focus.
  • The course prepares well for the main focus.

Questions about the lecture

Attendance (Lecture)

Lupe [6]

How often did you attend the lecture during the semester?

  • (nearly) always
  • 4–5 times
  • 2–3 times
  • 0–1 times


Lecture: Comprehensibility
Lupe [7]
  • I can follow the contents of the lecture without difficulty and I understand it well.
  • Is the structure of the tlak in the lecture clearly articulated?
  • Are the abbreviations and symbols used in the lecture clearly understandably explained?
  • The amount of matter can easily be manged.

Talk style

Lecture: Talk style
Lupe [8]
  • Does the lecturer keep eye contact to the students?
  • Does the lecturer's talk style motivate the students?
  • Are the contents of the lecture illustrated by concrete examples?
  • Do you think the lecturer tries to give a good talk?

Use of Media

Lecture: Use of media
Lupe [9]
  • The lecture is supported meaningfully by media (blackboard, slides, beamer, models, …).
  • The targeted use of media helps me to follow the lecture.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are clearly readable.
  • The blackboard / slides in the lecture are comprehensible.
  • The "appropriate" media is used at the "appropriate" time in the lecture.


Lecture: Misc
Lupe [10]
  • I cannot keep up to the lecture due to content overload.
  • The lecture is exhausting.
  • The lecture is boring.

General statements about the motivation

General statements / motivation
Lupe [11]
  • I am learning a lot useful things.
  • The contents of the course are very interesting for me.
  • The course motivates me to deal with the matter further on.
  • how did your motivation change throughout the semester? (possible answers: increased a lot – increased – decreased – decreased a lot)

Further questions about the course

Final opinion
Lupe [12]

What do you think about the course in total?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad
Difficulty of the lecture
Lupe [13]

If you think about your studies of electrical engineering or computer science, resp.: How difficult is the subject of this course compared to your previous courses?

  • very difficult
  • rather difficult
  • middle
  • rather easy
  • very easy
Preparation and rework time
Lupe [14]

How much time per week did you need to prepare and rework the lecture without the time in the lecture (and the excercises)?

Expected grade
Lupe [15]

What do you think: How will you be fraded at the end of the lecture?

  • very good
  • rather good
  • middle
  • rather bad
  • very bad


  • The topic was quite updated and give me a lot of understanding about the security and malicuous activites in Internet and give me a log of knowledge how to protect a network from such activities and will be more useful in my career in the future.
  • I have a lot experience in the field, thus the lecture was boring some time, but not because of being a bad lecture.
  • seems easy because things were usually well explained and interesting, although there was a lot of content.
  • Begrenzender Faktor: English in verschiedenen Ausprachen.
  • Es fehlt das Feld zum ankreuzen ob man es nicht einschätzen kann.
  • Ich bitte Professor Seifert um mehr Vorbereitung für die Vorlesungen.
  • Maybe Prof. Seifert could try to breathe deeply when trying to find his words to finish a long sentence. :-)

Lehre / Teaching, SoSe 2013

  • Routerlab (PR) [16]
  • NA: Internet Measurement (SE) [17]
  • Internet Security (VL) [18]
  • Internet Measurement (VL) [19]
  • Internet Routing (VL) [20]
------ Links: ------

Zusatzinformationen / Extras

Quick Access:

Schnellnavigation zur Seite über Nummerneingabe

Copyright TU Berlin 2008